| |
Poisons > Discussion on Aids/HIV Vaccines
The
following report takes its place among the mounting
evidence of US and multinational corporate incursions
on the fundamental rights of the human race to
survival itself. The pattern is clear for anyone and
everyone who has cared enough to go beyond the drivel
from mainstream media and access the wealth of
information that has been coming through the pipeline
for decades now, to wit: that there is in fact a
decision that was taken by a small number of this
planet's power elite (yes, a conspiracy) radically to
depopulate the planet of all but around 300 million
people. This is detailed in a document called
"The Strecker Memorandum" and it is
available elsewhere to anyone who wants to look for
it. By now it has become a very well known document
among people who have spent some time researching the
origin of AIDS.
Robert
Strecker was one of the first to identify the true
nature of the AIDS epidemic. He and
Leonard Horowitz (who wrote a great book entitled
"EMERGING VIRUSES: AIDS AND EBOLA" ) have,
in my view, correctly identified the true nature of
the conspiracy, and the fact of the matter is that Strecker actually found the memorandum, the smoking
gun, from The World Health Organisation.
The World
Health Organisation (WHO) (and others) actually in
1972 called for the CREATION of a virus that would
attack the immune system itself, and which has all
the attributes of the AIDS virus ...
Leonard
Horowitz, PhD, actually discovered the interm
"progress" reports filed by Dr Gallo et al,
as to his efforts to create the AIDS (HTLV 1) virus
spliced from the bovine leukemia virus and the sheep
visna virus. Gallo was to be hailed as the
co-discoverer of the AIDS virus in 1982. For those
who have been following the debate and who believe
with virologist Dr Peter Deusberg (who had CIA
connections himself) that AIDS is the result of
a confluence of co-factors, and that the actual AIDS
virus has never been identified that is plain
disinformation designed to take the heat and light
off the people who actually put it together.
See my book SUPPRESSED INVENTIONS AND OTHER
DISCOVERIES for more details.
That
there is mass genocide going on RIGHT NOW is
indisputable, except, perhaps, by a few system
apologist diehards who also think that global
overheating is still "unproven". The AIDS
pandemic was designed to depopulate Africa, (and
elsewhere) which it is now doing. The assumption
of the power elite is that the world is over
populated, which it very well may be, but that is
another story. Regardless, they think that the best
way to bring down the population is through the
dissemination of killer viruses, rather than through
birfth control, education, or rising living
standards.
Anyhow,
how is the development of an AIDS vaccine tied in
with this conspiracy? Why, you may well ask, if they
want everyone to get AIDS, would they develop a
vaccine against it? The answer is that NO VACCINE
THAT I HAVE INVESTIGATED ACUALLY WORKS AGAINST THE
DISEASE IT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK AGAINST. Moreover, if
you wanted to spread a disease to millions of people,
what better way than to "immunise" them
against it.
If you
think that this is just "conspiracy theory"
nonsense, consider this:
1. Reputable research indicates that the early polio
vaccine campaign in Africa was one of the first and
main transmission vehicles for AIDS. It perfectly
fits the epidemiology, and the vaccine is an
acknowledged source of SV-40, a virus which is known
to produce brain and other cancers. In fact even
today, there is no guarantee whatever that any
vaccine you may be allowing to be injected into your
or your child's body won't be contaminated by a
species-jumping virus.
As for
the assumption that the polio vaccine stopped the
polio epidemic, think (and look) again. The research
is there. Salk said that the Sabin vaccine was
dangerous and Sabin said the same about the Salk
vaccine. Robert Mendelshon MD said that they were
both right.In fact, early studies made in the 1950s
showed that given adequate vitamin C, NO CASE OF
POLIO EVER BECAME PARALYTIC. It's all in Katherine
Smith's new book THE CANCER PREVENTION HANDBOOK.
Needless to say, this study was suppressed.
2. The
more vaccines that are being created ... the worse
our health is becoming. Is there a causal connection?
You'd better believe it. Most vaccines contain a
cocktail not only of viruses, live and
"attenuated" but other garbage as well,
including mercury as a preservative. Mercury is the
most toxic non radioactive element on the Periodic
Table. How much does a child get? Any amount is too
much, and the actual amounts vary. However, shot into
the body of a days or weeks old baby, it can and does
cause "adverse reactions". Do the
manufacturers know all this. Of course they do. Do
the doctors? Many of them do these days because it
has been hard to keep the population completely
ignorant, but vaccines actually help their long term
"business": they contribute to chronic
illnesses. A sick population is also a more
compliant.
3. What
are some of the "adverse reactions" to
vaccines? These can range from mild fevers to autism,
brain damage and death. Less than 10% of these
are ever reported. Doctors just hate to report
"adverse reactions". However, there are
millions of adverse reactions every year. There is
now an autism epidemic, reliably associated with the
MMR and other vaccines. In some places 1 in 150
children are developing this debilitating disease,
usually shortly after receiving their
vaccinations. Most doctors still call this
"coincidence".
4.
We are being dumbed down, and quickly, the better to
establish the Brave New World of Multinational
Corporationism. Here in New Zealand where there is a
controlled press, it is difficult to get the real
skinny, unless you're on the Net. Consequently most
people still think that the pharmaceutical companies
and the government have our best interests at heart,
rather than money and power. To them I say "good
luck to you". Fact is, pharmaceutical companies
and governments seem to like killing, maiming or just
making millions and millions of people sick. It's
just kind of pathetic how many people still trust
them.
5. Don't
think that the killing will stop with Africa, either.
I think that those who would dramatically reduce the
world's population are working to do that on a number
of different levels. One of them is the cancer
epidemic, helped along by known environmental
carcinogens, vaccines and the super carcinogen of
them all: fluoride. But the human race is proving to
have a stronger immune system that I believe the
Controllers at first thought. People are not dying
off as fast at the schedule called for. So now comes
Plan B, the vaccine against AIDS. Only you see,
this vaccine not going to be voluntary. It is going
to be mandatory. Compulsory. And if that
happens, my friends, be careful. Be very very
careful.
This kind of thing must be stopped now, in its lethal
tracks. In fact ALL VACCINES must now be put on hold
as having proven themselves positively dangerous,
indeed profoundly debilitating and a menace to the
future health of the entire human race. We have been
brainwashed, ladies and gentlement, into believing
that vaccines are good for the health of our
children, when all the impartial evidence indicates
the contrary. We have sacrificed our health and the
health of millions of our children on the alter of
corporate profit and professional greed. Let it stop
now.
ORIGINAL MESSAGE FROM:
From: Sheri Nakken vaccineinfo@btinternet.com
"Report Predicts Massive Resistance to Mandatory
AIDS Vaccine ..."
newsmax.com
Report Predicts Massive Resistance to Mandatory AIDS
Vaccine
Wes Vernon Thursday, June 21, 2001
WASHINGTON - A new report predicts massive resistance
to a mandatory AIDS vaccine is coming in the U.S. in
the next few years.
Millions of parents would refuse to have their
children vaccinated by any variation of an HIV/AIDS
shot, the Committee to Protect Medical Freedom said
at a news conference Wednesday.
The
paper, titled "If AIDS doesnt kill you,
the AIDS vaccine will, declared an AIDS vaccine
would have HIV in it.
Among those supporting the findings of the study was
Dr. Howard Umovitz, a prominent member of a group of
scientists calling for an HIV/AIDS vaccine
moratorium.
Jim Turner, a Washington attorney and expert on the
swine flu vaccine scandal of the 1970s, lent his
support, as did Barbara Lee Fisher, co-founder and
president of the National Vaccine Information Center.
Redmond Handy, an opponent of the militarys
mandatory anthrax vaccination program, also warned of
what he sees as the dangers of rushing into a
mandatory AIDS vaccine program.
The thrust of the report, written by Clifford
Kincaid, is that theres big money in rushing
the an AIDS vaccine to market, some of it tied up in
conflict-of-interest questions involving the
promoters and their connections with companies that
stand to benefit. More to the point, he says, there
are indications that the vaccine, possibly to be
administered to 11- to 12-year-old children, or
perhaps earlier, contains a risk of inflicting the
very disease it is intended to prevent.
Promoting the idea of a mandatory AIDS vaccine is
United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Anan, along
with high-tech magnate Bill Gates. Kincaid challenges
them to take the vaccine themselves if they are so
certain it is safe.
Some of the discussions on radio talk shows around
the country indicate "the U.S. could witness
massive civil disobedience against a massive
mandatory HIV/AIDS vaccine. Parents want to know what
is in the vaccine, and they should be told that it is
a form of HIV that the government says can cause
AIDS, the report alleges.
Jon Cohen, author of "Deep Denial,
published by the New York Academy of Sciences earlier
this year, is quoted as saying that "medical
products sometimes do the opposite of what they are
supposed to do, causing illness rather than
alleviating it. Such risk, of course, is common to
all drugs, but at least many sick patients accept
that they would have fared poorly even
without the ill-fated drug treatment. Vaccines, in
contrast, are administered to people, often
children.
Which
means the vaccine would be targeted at those without
AIDS. Further, AIDS is most likely to be avoided by
choosing a healthful way of life. The study asks:
Does it make sense to subject innocent children or
AIDS-free military personnel to a risk that could be
greater than the that of the disease, depending on
the habits chosen as they go forward in their lives?
Polio and smallpox, for example, could strike without
warning. The public has been warned about AIDS and
how to avoid it.
In anticipation of Wednesdays news conference,
various health agencies have told Gannett News
Service there was no plan to make the AIDS vaccine
mandatory for any American.
But Kincaid, the director of the Committee to Protect
American Freedoms, says the proof is available at the
Web site of the U.S. Military HIV research program,
where it is openly stated that AIDS vaccines under
development will be "licensed and used to
protect military personnel. These shots are not
voluntary in the military service, he says.
Kincaid added that Dr. Deborah Brix, who runs the
program, could have made the denial in the 30 days
since he asked her in writing a series of questions
about the program. His question included: "Who
made the decision to use and mandate this vaccine on
U.S. military personnel?
Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder of the National
Vaccine Information Center, reports that a member of
the federal committee that recommends vaccine for
children had said that an AIDS vaccine would be
tested and then forced on all 12-year-old children.
Neal
Halsey, M.D., chairman of the American Academy of
Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases,
reminded HIV vaccine researchers and developers at a
meeting in February 1997 of an advisory committee of
the federal Centers for Disease Control that CDC
plans to target 11- to 12-year-old children for
"universal application of an HIV vaccine.
The Kincaid study says "babies are being used as
guinea pigs now. The National Institute for
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, under the auspices
of the federal Department of Health and Human
Services, is sponsoring an HIV vaccine test on babies
born to HIV-infected women.
A spokesman for this program, where mothers have no
ability to provide informed written consent, has
admitted that "a small percentage of our trial
applicants have become infected and now have
access to "the best medical care
available.
One
cannot get any details as to who the "guinea
pigs are. Have they chosen to remain anonymous?
"Or are their identities being concealed because
they are dead or dying?
Dr. Umovitz, a member of a group of scientists
calling for a moratorium on all HIV vaccine research,
says coverage of "promising vaccines is
extremely misleading, and those being tested so far
appear harmful and dangerous. Some undergoing trials
increase the likelihood of infection and accelerate
the
disease. In a paper, he quotes Dr. Albert Sabin as
saying the available data "provide no basis for
testing any HIV vaccine in humans.
U.N. leader Anan and Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has
engaged in extensive research on AIDS, think an AIDS
vaccine just may be a "secret weapon.
But the Committee to Protect Medical Freedom
concludes: "What if the theory driving the
vaccine research is scientifically bankrupt?
.
What if their war on AIDS proves to be a no-win war
in which millions more die? Then the world will move
on to the next crisis and the same people may still
be in charge.
Related Articles; HIV &
Circumcision - The vaccination
debate.
Search for more vaccination information
|
|
|
|