Stopping Breast Cancer in Its Tracks
by Sherry A. Rogers, MD
Breast cancer accounts for
300,000 new cases per year, with 150,000 deaths per
year. (USA) There is a plethora of evidence showing
many environmental chemicals, especially pesticides,
high-fat diets, processed-food diets and fast foods
with trans-fatty acids and low nutritional value all
play a role in potentiating breast cancer.
In the early part of this
decade, thousands of women in over 133 medical
centers across the world participated in a five-year
study to see if the chemotherapeutic agent
tamoxifen (an anti-estrogen) could be used to prevent
breast cancer. Many scientists quickly found that
tamoxifen itself causes cancer, and innocent
women on the program developed blindness and cancers.
(British Medical Journal, March 28, 1992 and Science
News, April 25, 1992, 144:266-7)
Failed by pharmaceutical
treatments such as tamoxifen, which was discovered to
cause cancer, many women are seeking smarter
solutions. Fortunately, there are many ways
that people have beaten breast cancer other than
taking carcinogenic chemotherapies. The most
successful have been with diets high in
phytochemicals.
In addition to nutrients such
as vitamins A and D and CoQ10, which have caused
reversal and redifferentiation of cancer cells
(making cancer cells become normal cells again)
in some cases, an exciting new nutrient on the
horizon is calcium D-glucarate (CDG). It has not only
prevented breast cancer, but also reversed some
cases.
In one study, researchers used
a group of rats in which 100% would normally develop
breast cancer. But in those treated with CDG, only
56% developed cancers. Of the 56% that did
develop cancer, there were 87.5% fewer tumors per
animal than normal. In those that did get cancer, per
every 10 tumors the animals would have gotten, they
had less than one. (Isr J Med Sci, 1995;31:101-5)
Scientists have studied CDG
which is naturally made in the human body in cells,
organ cultures, animals and humans. It appears to be
non-toxic, and without side effects. CDG has also
been used to treat other forms of cancer. There is
also a synergism of benefit when CDG is coupled with
another agent, like vitamin A, that is also known to
inhibit cancer growth. (Eur J Cancer,
1992;28A(4/5):784-8 and Life Sciences,
1994;(54)18:1299-1303)
CDG works by metabolizing an
excess of estrogen in the body. Normally, estrogen is
metabolized by the liver. Even though estrogen has
many benefits, as with every hormone, there is
an optimal level above which it can create problems.
Estrogen is known to potentiate estrogen-sensitive tumors like breast tumors.
The body gets rid of excess estrogen by passing it
through the liver, where it hooks onto a conjugate
called glucuronic acid and passes out with the stool.
This is one way the body cleans house, and the
process is called glucoronidation.
Normally, the glucuronide
conjugate passes from the liver into the bile, then
into the gut where the body gets rid of it.
Sometimes, there are high levels of a bad enzyme,
called beta-glucuronidase, that rip the glucuronide
conjugate off the estrogen. Then the estrogen is free
to be reabsorbed back into the bloodstream
where it originated. So the body actually wastes many
nutrients in the process of detoxifying the estrogen,
only for it to be reabsorbed. The net effect is that
of losing detoxifying nutrients and having the excess
cancer-promoting estrogen still floating
freely. This is not desirable, especially if breast
cancer is a risk. CDG inhibits or stops the
glucuronidase from freeing the estrogen for
reabsorption. (J National Cancer Inst,
1989;81:1820-3 and Bio Chem Pharmac, 1991;41
(10):1471-7)
It is now possible to measure
the amount of harmful beta-glucuronidase activity in
an individuals body through a simple stool test that
you can do at home once your doctor orders it.
There are several things you
can do to decrease your beta-glucuronidase activity.
For example, diets low in meats promote intestinal
flora that are low in this enzyme. Conversely, diets
high in meat foster more of this bad enzyme.
CDG supplementation can also
reduce beta-glucuronidase activity. In addition to
promoting the metabolism of estrogen, CDG promotes
the metabolism of environmental
cancer-potentiating chemicals. (Carcinogenesis,
1986;7(9):1463-6 and Res Comm Chem Pathol Pharmacol,
Sept. 986;33:25-32)
Because CDG speeds the
detoxification of hormones and chemicals, a potential
side effect is that blood levels of drugs being taken
could be lowered, and their reabsorption impaired.
Therefore, if you depend on medications, ask your
doctor what the function of beta-glucuronidase is in
the bowel. If he gives you the correct answer, then
he knows enough chemistry to guide you in factoring
CDG in with your medications.
The dosage would be three to
four 500 mg capsules twice a day as a preventive, or
if you have already had breast cancer, four to six
500-mg capsules twice a day. It appears that
women with high risk of breast cancer would be wise
not only to take antioxidants like vitamins A, C, and
E, and CoQ10, but also to eat a diet rich in
phytochemicals. Anyone who has already rallied
against breast cancer may want to consider taking it
for the rest of her life.
Sherry A. Rogers, MD
The Health Letter
Sand Key Publishing Company
Box 40101
Sarasota, Florida
34242 USA
NEW YORK (Reuters Health)
A
diet rich in sources of the antioxidant beta-carotene
may help lower a woman's risk of breast cancer after
menopause, according to a study in the January issue
of the Journal Epidemiology.
Yet unclear, however, is how
early in life a woman should begin to pay careful
attention to beta-carotene-rich foods such as
spinach, broccoli, and cantaloupe.
These findings indicate that
although diets high in beta-carotene may be
associated with lower breast cancer risk, there does
not seem to be evidence of a critical time period
during which such diets are more relevant,''
according to the researchers, Aisha Jumaan of the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in
Atlanta, Georgia, and multicenter colleagues in the
US and Sweden.
The authors write that a diet
high in beta-carotene at least 1.5 years before the
date of diagnosis of breast cancer in subjects, or
the date of screening mammography in the controls,
was associated with reduced breast cancer risk. The
relationship was stronger in women whose diets had
been rich in sources of beta-carotene for at least 20
years before diagnosis or screening.
However, the authors note that
recall bias may cause small but significant
differences in the eating habits of the subjects to
remain undetected. ``Such misclassification might
impair our ability to identify a critical time period
when dietary beta-carotene may exert a protective
effect on breast cancer risk,'' they said.
The case-control study included
273 women with breast cancer and 371 women without
breast cancer, who ranged from 40 to 70 years of age.
Researchers conducted telephone interviews with
subjects about diet at various periods throughout
their lives. The subjects were selected from of a
group of women screened for breast cancer in Sweden.
Beta-carotene intake was
divided by quartiles at various reported years before
the reference date, defined as 6 months before the
date of diagnosis of breast cancer in the cases, or 6
months before the date of screening mammography in
the controls. Researchers examined beta-carotene
intake at 5-year increments before the reference date
in order to gauge the effect of exposure to
beta-carotene on breast cancer risk.
Disclaimer: All Information is provided for
educational purposes only and not intended
to be used for any therapeutic purpose, neither is it intended to diagnose,
prevent, treat or cure any disease. Please consult a health care
professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions.
While attempts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this information,
The Health Information Network does not accept any responsibility for any errors or
omissions.