| |
Cancer & Diet
The Right Diet
Improves Cancer Survival
by Sherry A
Rogers, MD
Northeast
Center for Environmental Medicine, Syracuse, New
York.
Over the decades,
numerous people have written their own
autobiographies on how they turned around
irreversible end-stage cancers with the macrobiotic
diet. Anthony Satillaro, MD, wrote about his
metastatic prostate cancer in "Recalled by
Life". Hugh Faulkner, MD, reversed his cancer of
the pancreas six years ago, when he was 74, and wrote
about it in "Physician Heal Thyself".
Ealine Nussbaum
described her incredible siege with metastatic cancer
of the ovaries in her 30's which spread to liver
lungs and the backbones. The backbones collapsed and,
after two years of failed surgery, chemotherapy and
radiation, she was given three weeks to live with her
pneumonia. In fact, she was told that antibiotics
could not he used for the pneumonia because she was
so weak from the vicious spread of cancer, that the
antibiotics might shorten her three weeks. It was at
this point she turned to macrobiotics and wrote the
story of her cure in "Recovery". That was
over eight years ago, and I delight in lecturing with
her each year, as I see her vivaciously returning
from jogging.
Other people wrote
their own stories in 'The Cure is in the
Kitchen", which is the only book to give in
detail what it is that people ate and did day-to-day
to turn irreversible end-stage incurable cancers
around with a diet and lifestyle change. This
information is no limited to just cancers. Dr Dean
Ornish published his work in the prestigious British
medical journal Lancet in 1990. He
demonstrated that people with end-stage
cardiovascular disease could also reverse their PET
scans when high-tech cardiovascular bypass surgery
and modern-day cholesterol-lowering drugs had failed.
Recently, 6
researchers published a study showing that a
macrobiotic diet, even if not done perfectly,
increased the one-year survival for cancer of the
pancreas from 10% to 52%. Likewise, they have shown
that with cancer of the prostate, the median survival
can be improved from 72 months to 228 months (Carter
JP, Saxe Ci; Newbold V, Peres CE, Campeau RJ, and
Bernal-Green, L:
Hpothesis: Dietary
management may improve survival from
nutritionally-linked cancers based on analysis of
representative cases. Journal of the American
College of Nutrition, vol.12, no 3, 209-226,
1993).
As increasingly more
research points out that the causes of most cancers
are dietary, it seems only logical that the
improvement in survival should also have a bearing on
dietary intake. One of the biggest problems we have
seen, however, is compliance. In other words, it is
very difficult for people to figure out how to do the
diet and di it as carefully as they need to, in order
to have long-term survival and actually reverse
cancer. That is why we took the time to spell out the
directions in "The Cure is In the Kitchen".
For there are scores of books telling how to prepare
the food and the philosophy of macrobiotics, but no
one has ever actually spelled out in detail what it
is that cancer survivors did day-t~day to make their
dietary changes such a success. But, everything is
not for everyone, and that includes this therapy.
But what about the
stories of long-time macrobiotic-using people who
have actually gotten cancer? How can we reconcile
this? Many people become disheartened when they hear
of someone who has been on a macrobiotic diet for a
long time who has just developed a cancer. But they
neednt be disenchanted with the diet, but rather they
need to understand that we are in a different era
now.
First of all, we are
the first generation of humans ever to be exposed to
such a high number of chemicals in our daily work,
home and traffic environments. The average person is
exposed to over 500 chemicals a day, and this does
not include someone who works in a particularly
overloaded chemical environment such as a factory.
These chemicals have wide potential for causing
cancers and many of the mechanisms are known and have
been spelled out in the scientific research for
years.
For example, did you
ever wonder how they produce animals with cancer to
do research on cancer drugs? They can give the animal
one dose of a chemical in order to cause a cancer.
Yes, one solitary dose. So, you can imagine what the
total cumulative effect of our daily exposures an be.
For example, an average carpet can outgas benzene,
toluene, xylene, trichiorethylene and formaldehyde,
all of which are cancer potentiators, and some can
actually induce it themselves. But no one has studied
the total effect of this load on the body. Remember
the TV program where the researchers found the mice
in the jar with the new carpeting were dead in the
morning? Suffice it to say that with such an
unprecedented load of chemicals each day to detoxify,
we are constantly in more danger of initiating cancer
than ever before.
Nutrient
loss in detox
The other problem that
goes hand in hand with this unprecedented exposure to
chemicals is that every time we detoxify a chemical,
we use up, lose, throw away forever, a certain amount
of nutrients. For example, if you walk into a grocery
store, you dontt even have to be aware of the smell
of a pesticide, but for everv molecule of pesticide
that your body' detoxifies, you throw away or use up
forever, a molecule of glutathione magnesium and
more.
Your body uses
nutrients to make this glutathione and it uses up
energy as well. Clutathione is a tripeptide
synthesised from your body's amino acids, glycine.
glutamic acid and cysteine; it then uses this
tripeptide to onjugate, or hook on to, the chemical
to make it a heavier molecular weight. In this way,
it becomes more bar and is easily dragged out of the
liver into the bile ducts and into the gut where the
body disposes of the chemical in the stool.
But you have lost the
tripeptide conjugate, glutathione, in the process.
Now you have a reduced store of detoxifiers with
which to meet your daily chemical challenges. So now
some chemicals have a chance of sneaking into your
body, but your body is unable to detoxify them. So
instead they initiate the chemistry to start a
cancer.
If these two reasons
weren't enough, there is yet another reason why there
is so much more cancer than there used to be: we are
the first generation to eat so many processed foods.
Up to 25-75% of the nutritional value has been
remo;'ed from processed foods, so that they will have
a longer shelf life. This is a vast experiment in
what the human body can endure. For example, vitamins
B6 and E are removed from oils and grain, so they
will last longen But these vitamins are necessary to
prevent cardiovascular disease, which is now the
number one cause of death.
Twenty-five years ago
when I was at medical school, it was rare to know
anybody with cancer, and the cancer rate was about I
in 11 people. Now it is the second most common cause
of death and rather than being restricted mainly to
people over 55, as it was back then, it's not at all
unusual now to see people in our offices with cancers
at 21, 29 and 31.
So, what can you do to
protect yourself? "Read Tired or Toxic?"
which has references for all of the statements here,
as well as instructions for your physician to assay
your blood for the most common mineral deficiencies
that occur today and find out what is missing, so
that you will have a healthier detoxification system
and more protection. For starters, I would suggest an
rbc zinc, rbc copper and rbc manganese, for these are
crucial for function of superoxide dismutase, witch
is a family of enzymes necessary to neutralize the
toxic and carcinogenic effects of chemicals that get
into our bodies. And you would need to do the
magnesium loading test (described in the book) since
magnesium is crucial for these pathways.
For example,
government surveys show that the average American
diet provides only 40% or less than half of the
magnesium you need in a day. Unfortunately, another
study in the Journal of the American Medical
As5ociation (June 13, 1990) showed that when
1,033 patients who were hospitalised, over 54% were
low in magnesium. The worst part of the study showed
that 90% of the doctors never even thought of
ordering a magnesium test. So, in essence, what is
usual and customary in the practice of
Medicine in the U.S.
today is pretty poor in terms of what we know about
the prevalence of nutrient deficiencies. And it is
even more disheartening when research confirms that
it is these very deficiencies that allow a chemical
to become a carcinogen in an individual.
Multiple studies
throughout the scientific literature show that a vast
number of the populace has deficiencies in
intracellular copper, zinc, chromium, molybdenum,
manganese, copper, magnesium and much more. These are
crucial in the workings of the chemical
detoxification pathways in the body, to protect us
form the cancer-promoting effects of everyday
chemical overload. If the body does not properly
detoxify chemicals then they back up and damage the
genetic structure and can turn on the message to
produce cancers.
Nowadays in our
office, it is not unusual for patients to come from
Canada or England, Jordan or California. But it is
unusual to see anyone anymore with all of their detox
nutrients at normal levels... even if they have been
macrobiotic counsellors for 15 years, as two recent
examples showed us.
Cravings are
significant
One of the most common
clues that you have nutrient deficiencies is if you
have cravings. For cravings are a natural symptom
that you are eating out of balance and/or have
nutrient deficiencies. It is an animal instinct. The
only problem is that animals gnaw on the bark of some
tree for the missing nutrients, and we forage in the
refrigerator for Hagen Daz. Actually, even if you
have any symptoms at all, or require any medications,
you most likelv have biochemical abnormalities that
can be identified.
So, when you read
about someone who has been a long-time macrobiotic
practitioner who suddenly has cancer, don't be
disheartened or give up on the program; for indeed it
is a very healthful lifestyle for the majority of
people. But it does need to be modified in this
century-in view of our daily unprecedented chemical
overloads and prevalent nutrient deficiencies. The
macrobiotic diet could stand alone and heal cancers
40 years ago, but no longer is that the case. Now we
need to pay more attention to the rampant nutrient
deficiencies as well as to the total load of
stressors to the body; For the diet is only one part
of the package of total modalities that can help
bring about weilness.
For a list of nutrient
tests your doctor should check, other parts of the
total load, and over 33 biochemical reasons why
macrobiotics are able to heal cancer, read 'Tred or
Toxic?" Then for the first book to spell out the
explicit healing steps of the macrobiotic diet, read
"The Cure is In the Kitchen". These are
available from Prestige Publishing, Box ~61, Syracuse
NY 13220, 800-846-ONUS.
Sherry A
Rogers is a specialist in
environmental and nutritional medicine. She has
published 7 books, 14 scientific papers in the
medical literature, lectured in 6 countries and over
50 US cities. She has taught for over 10 years the
advanced courses for physicians learning these newer
techniques.
She was the
Environmental Medicine column editor for Internal
Medicine World, A Report, that goes to 100,000
physicians, for two years, and has published dozens
of magazine articles and done numerous radio and
television shows.
She has a private practice in Syracuse, New York,
where she sees patients from all over the world, with
undiagnosable or untreatable problems. The malor
thrust of her investigations is to identify hidden,
yet treatable causes rather than using medications to
mask and stifle symptoms.
She is board-certified by the American Academy
ofFamily Practice and the American Academy of
Environmental Medicine, and is a fellow of the
American College of Allergy arid Immunology.
My interest is in
the future, because land my children are going to
spend the rest of our lives there. HARRIET KETTERING.
In addition to
warning against reproductive technologies, what we
must also provide are visions for a different kind of
life: a life without one's own biological children
perhaps, a life in which a woirian is valued for
herself a life in which women value themselves.
RENATE KLEIN
It takes an act of
complete courage for a woman to explore other ways of
being in the world beside motherhood. It takes an act
of courage for a woman to give birth to a book, a
painting, a business, an idea, a dance. Giving birth
to oneself is an act of complete courage. NANCY
WAKEMAN
|
|
|
|