Summary
This page discusses some of the fraud behind pharmaceutical company controlled medical research institutions. These institutions are responsible for preventing numerous safe treatments from getting to the public.

Your Doctor’s Information
Even if you have the best doctors, their information about alternative cancer treatments is probably incorrect. Doctors are so busy that they must rely on summaries of medical research.

NCI Publishes Summaries
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the most active organization screening potential anti-cancer agents. NCI has a $2.2 billion annual budget (yes billion) mostly supplied by our taxes. (USA) After testing Cancell™, NCI published the following false test summary which is easily found on the web: "Cancell™ did not demonstrate a biological effect considered worthy of further study." This is hotly debated by Cancell™ proponents

A Long History of Misinformation
Researchers who are funded by drug manufacturing companies we believe have a vested interest in the company products and willingly support dis-information on low cost treatments and cures.

Condensed Summary
Professor George Mathe, French cancer specialist, "Scientific Medicine Stymied," Medecines Nouvelles (Paris), said in March 1989, "If I contracted cancer, I would never go to a standard cancer treatment centre. Cancer victims who live far from such centres have a chance."

We cannot rely on mainstream doctors to recommend the correct cancer treatment. You must rely on yourself. If you can read the above two books, you will most likely avoid:

• Being operated on to determine if your tumors are cancerous. Biopsies and operations have a good chance of spreading cancer cells and is completely unnecessary because there is a urine test that is as reliable as a biopsy (source: World Without Cancer).
• Being radiated at, but radiation is usually just a delay tactic and the side effect of radiation is cancer (source: The Cancer Industry).
• Given chemo, which derails your immune system and wrecks your kidneys. If the cancer persists, and it usually does (World Without Cancer by Griffin), your body will require months of recovery before most alternative treatments can help.

If you don't avoid the above course of action, you and your insurance company will have spend about $200,000. Consider that one out of four people get cancer, do the math, and you will have a feel for the most significant aspect of the cancer industry: $$$. You can read a sample of the information in Griffin's book relating to the success rate of conventional treatment including chemo on a separate page of this web site. (That page must be printed separately.)

Doctors in Favor of Alternatives
Many doctors say that they support alternative treatments. But, these same doctors talk their patients into talking the dangerous conventional treatments first. Then, after chemo has destroyed the patient's immune system, they say, "OK try those alternatives now." This is backwards in the extreme. Doesn't it make more sense to take the safer treatments first especially since all conventional treatments are known to cause cancer?

Media vs Cancell™
Why you probably haven't heard of Cancell™ and how its reputation was ruined:

• The developer, James Sheridan wished it to be free to all cancer sufferers, he refused to get in bed with the drug companies who could afford to pay for FDA testing.
• Without FDA approval Sheridan distributed Entelev® (the name Cancell™ was introduced later). Not surprisingly, the FDA tried to prevent any lab from testing Sheridan's compound while he continued to give it away.
• The $7 billion a year Chemo industry titans viewed Cancell™ as a competitor. Apparently they took advantage of a golden opportunity presented to them by Ed Sopcak who took over the manufacture and distribution of Entelev® and Cancell™ in 1984 and changed the name to Cancell™.
• Around 1992, inexplicably, Ed Sopcak completely changed Cancell™'s formulation to a homeopathic like product that chemically appeared to be water. Suddenly, media interest swelled. Sopcak was interviewed by magazines and a book was written.

Was the Chemo industry responsible for this well timed publicity about a formula that chemically, had nothing to do with the original Cancell™ formula? To answer that question you can take the Cancer Conspiracy book link near the bottom of this page and read abstracts of nearly twenty books on the subject.

"NCI agreed to evaluate Cancell™. Preliminary tests were undertaken in 1990 and conducted twice for verification. The results of these tests indicated that Cancell™ did not demonstrate a biological effect considered worthy of further study."

The actual test results tell a completely different story.

Next